A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
这特么是美国版《我和我的父辈》啊？！实在不能理解，2022年了，为什么这种毫无创新，没有诚意的好莱坞流水线真人改编体育电影能杀入奥斯卡，还一路冲击到最佳影片提名！难以想象，奥斯卡如今都被黑人，同性，少数族裔这些政治正确绑架成这副鬼样子。本来对黑人没什么坏印象，但看着威尔·史密斯整天叼着牙签，吊儿郎当，自我吹嘘，拿着保护做PUA的挡箭牌，一路把孩子当筹码，换取全家的好生活，证明自己不是废物，挟孩子以令诸侯，反击自我敏感的肤色问题，鸠占鹊巢，目中无人，还一路顺风顺水，取得成功，反倒让人觉得小人得志，反感顿起。也许，导演本就不想为黑人平权，而是故意借机讽刺成功的黑人背后，有多么滑稽，要这样的话，那还是白人牛批。
采访孩子的部分像是看了一集《人生七年》。全片下来更像是和观众谈一场心理治疗 ？吧
确实是中规中矩的传记片，但我觉得并不冗长沉闷，大小威的成长不是主线，主线是一个男人坚定自己的球王培养计划以及运动之余学业也不能落下的“疯狂”信仰。坚持自己吹过的牛X，直到所有预言都能实现，还有比这个更励志更杰克苏的吗。威尔·史密斯确实演得很好。其他的没了。哦，还有，要是我爸爸从小我立志培养我什么运动就好了。
而无论是从妈妈还是大小威的角度来讲故事，都能讲出不同的但同样精彩的故事，哪怕从其他三姐妹的角度来拍，这个故事依然精彩。
这是恐怖片，类型写着传记，实际是粉饰和吹捧，现实中极度功利的鸡娃人渣，和这片儿的父亲不是一回事。这种东西看多了会影响大脑认知，远离爹味！
处理得比较收。对运动题材电影我其实不能算懂行。对于这个父亲的教育方式，以及他对小孩的“不能文盲、不要burn out”的保护，确实有些叹为观止。而且他竟然还做到了。也就是因为做到了才得以拍成电影吧;)
stay humble... not even possible
真的又拖沓又无趣的剧本，人物都没写好，怎么演都是纸上谈兵的感觉。这要是称帝真的最水之一了。电影更偏功能性一些，感觉编剧和导演都是接了个行货，没太走心。
很高兴终于可以再次看到威尔史密斯扮演了这种比较严肃的角色，毕竟商业大片很赚钱但也不能一直看，除此之外，每一位小演员的表演都很出色，整个故事平淡无奇，虽然是部工整的流水线传记片，不过还蛮励志的，if you've got a talent, go make something of it。
首先恭喜威尔斯密斯拿下奥斯卡最佳男主角。
电影里对大威小威家庭的描绘，对理查德这样严父角色的塑造，其实这不是我们国内这些人最缺失的？来自家庭与父母的支持，而非代际之间的隔阂与断裂。
家喻户晓的网坛名将威廉姆斯姐妹传记，主角却是父亲。
《20世纪女人》的伦理有多个视角所以还相对有趣，这回只有一个视点就太单调了
自然舒服的叙事。在我们照顾孩子之前我们都不知道如何去照顾孩子。小主角好灵。
父王自有妙计。拍的是结果论倒推，顺风顺水。我喜欢败局收场，不喜欢夹道欢迎，也不喜欢字幕卡升华。
写网球名将大威小威成长的体育励志片，主角却是她们的父亲，当然也简化了这一真实人物的复杂人生，进行了“过滤”。应该是美国的“政治正确”的主旋律电影，据说剧本写成后、曾遇到不少干涉、修改。男主获个表演奖是有可能的，其他没有多少可说的。
为什么他爹这么有精力，没日没夜训练孩子，还能搞这么多外遇。。。有精力这个事儿是遗传的吗
不管理查德这种做法是否正确（毕竟这个东西没有公式可以套）但他坚持让大小威保障学业的做法太正确了。
5.华金演了一个微胖有耐心带孩子的大叔，真的蛮无聊的一部远不如菊次郎的带娃片，毫无新意，可能也就形式上好一点而已，吹的太虚高了。
感到虚弱，推动叔侄关系前进的不该是关系外的父母问题和“回家倒数”#TribecaScreeningRoom
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
