Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这样的江湖 这样的武侠 这样的电影 又有何不可呢
据说成片历经千辛万苦
还算可以吧，配乐有点致敬老片的感觉，摄影的画面感还需要提升。
好看中时而带着不好看的电影，感觉故事还挺好的，但是讲出来的方式可能有点怪，意料之外这个片不是很难看。
前紧后松，没有全盘掌控好，应该还是欠些火候的原因。但至少让人看出整个制作团队的诚意还是满满的。
想法很好，执行一塌糊涂，比《双旗镇刀客》差了不止一截。演技、台词、演员武术功底、剧本节奏控制都堪称平庸，预算受限带来的粗糙感（以坟地打斗一场戏的打光、演员鬓角的胶水为代表）也很明显
这是开年最期待的影片，对于有着武侠情结的80后来说，这部影片不管从道具、动作还是细节，都显得诚意满满。作为一部网大，不俗不媚不吵不闹实数难得。
想拍出武侠风格，可惜没拍好。节奏把控不行，没有那种江湖侠气。内娱武侠电影还需多多努力才行啊。
没报什么期望看完后居然觉得有惊喜，索然剧情俗套但看得出诚意满满，三星的水准是有的。其中台词不乏亮点，“他妈的，又捅这里。”“命运都是幻像，一切早已发生”，不错。
现实主义的武侠片。突出一个真实，底层人真实的生存驱动，真实的侠义信仰，真实的损人利己卑鄙邪恶。动作戏很少吊钢丝飞来飞去，真实的人力械斗，某些POSE忍不住地扭捏做了一下态。总体很朴实、清新，在满屏幕都是上天入地、电闪雷鸣、风驰电掣、地动山摇、万有引力能量守恒定律皆失效的动作场面的形势下，本片实属难得的一朵野百合。
用逻辑讲不通，用理性讲不通，只能讲感情了，都讲得通了。感觉主人公像是击败一个个小赌场，最后跟boss决斗的是一场梭哈，到最后了还不放心，感觉是个骗局。其实一切都是那么的真实。
很不错的一部电影，阐述了侠义精神，没有明星大腕，武打设计不浮夸，没有吊着威亚的漫天飞舞。
这个剧情如果是20年前，算是佳作。现在看的话就一般了。最后的决战勉强及格，其他打戏都还不错。尤其是坟头决斗，算得上大师级了。
太好看的武侠片了，武打戏真的棒！五星拉拉分！
真不错，大有徐浩峰的风格。演员要相当的努力才有这功夫。
武打设计不错，但是人物立不住，故事太苍白，表演也有点粗糙，千人斩很明显是在模仿隔壁《绣春刀》吧。
美国老黑的西部抗战神剧，排面大，配乐好。故事脱离正常逻辑！
很不错的武侠电影，动作写实，风格凌厉，但剧情不够，故事凌乱
偶然因片名吸引找来看，看完感觉还行。台词，布景，好多《东邪西毒》的影子。
比起那个雪中……，至少武打镜头是过得去的！以资鼓励。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
