A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
节奏欢快 哈哈哈 下一部 马东锡是不是要手撕灭霸了
下下部打变态们联盟。
不太行，这部的孙锡久是扮悍匪，上一部的张谦蛋才是真悍匪，压迫感和狠劲儿都差点，这类片不够爽就是原罪。韩国人一窝蜂跑去看这个估计就是想发泄下，本质上就是为屌丝撸管的电影，但这部，不够持久。
马东锡凭借一己之力，彻底颠覆了我对韩国男子花美男的形象。
虽然动作方面略逊第一部，但整体上要比上一部更精良，更成熟。从《我的解放日志》中认识了孙锡久，当时就觉得他很适合演大反派，结果在本片他真的就贡献了一个十恶不赦，杀人不眨眼的反派角色，非常出彩。马东锡饰演的警察依旧鲁莽暴躁，战斗力爆表，虽然很有魅力，但把他塑造成钢铁之躯有一个弊端，就是优势太明显，遇到哪个坏蛋他都占绝对的上风，所以结果毫无悬念，唯一的悬念，就是好奇反派会被揍得有多惨。
就是喜欢看一拳超人马东锡大叔揍坏蛋，过瘾，带感，揍得好！
时隔五年，神马东锡的铁拳依旧无敌，却没有当时看第一部的爽快感，主要是反派塑造得有些单薄，第一部的尹启相比这一部的孙锡久要出色得多，以至于片子结尾的配角还玩儿了一把“哈尔滨张晨”的梗
不如第一部，太拖沓了！太墨迹了！打戏之间的间距越拉越长，不如第一部看得过瘾，属于第一部可以，续集凑数的表现。当然了，爽片依旧是爽片，只是爽得程度不一罢了。
黑吃黑狗咬狗，绝对暴力一顿乱捅。马东锡这身子板是不是又壮了。。
就你多拍点马东锡扇巴掌就完了，别整花的，玩批了不是，观众想看啥你不知道吗？更别提1里的烟火味，乡土气，多好啊，到2成了超英了是吧，醉了。
商场持刀、闹市撞车伤人拍得都挺精彩的，但是怎么说呢，第一部哈尔滨张谦实在深入人心，那股狠劲是看了就让人害怕，但这一部马东锡个人色彩太强了，孙锡久人设单薄战斗力也不行，而且偏搞笑不是很喜欢。没有1的对比的话，2还是可以的，不说了我再去三刷1了
这一部的反派实在太弱了，无论是智力，武力还是组织能力，和第一部的张谦根本没法比，像一个不听话爱惹事的b崽子。
人生四大乐趣:
动作戏靠调度和声音设计有加码，叙事看少了10分钟就知道在衰减。感觉主创对新一部的反派的信心没有前作足，自我致敬式的笑料反而暗示了大鱼吃小鱼。
看马东锡就一个字“爽”。这种暴力的直接碾压充分调动了观众的肾上腺素，反派虽也难以匹敌，但是房间里的一段长镜头调度还不错，可惜最后大战没有长镜头一波。还可以。
和第一部一脉相承，剧情上说得过去，硬汉肉搏的爽感及刀刀进肉的砍杀依旧让人血脉喷张，当作爽片来看不错，也算是韩国目前成熟电影工业的模板化产品了。对于反派最好还是多留点神秘感和距离感，不然前期感觉还是个嗜血怪物，后期看多了也就麻木了，反派的逼格就慢慢消散了，应多学学《黄海》，对反派棉大叔的刻画总是点到为止，直到最后也吊足了观众胃口。
砍刀最终也砍不过马东锡的拳头，拳拳到肉，无处可藏。
金榜题名时。
简单粗暴纯爽片了。解放日志后遗症，总觉得孙锡久是被马东锡在越南打完了，才去乡下躲的。。。
动作戏简化成马东锡的重拳了，一拳超人一样，虽然简单，但的确爽
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
