剧情介绍

  Daniel Mays (Line Of Duty, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, Public Enemies) stars in BBC Two's powerful factual drama as Peter Wildeblood, a thoughtful and private gay journalist whose lover Eddie McNally (played by newcomer to television, Richard Gadd), under pressure from the authorities, turned Queen's evidence against him in one of the most explosive court cases of the 1950s - the infamous Montagu Trial.
  More than ten years before the decriminalisation of homosexual acts in 1967, Peter Wildeblood, and his friends Lord Montagu (Mark Edel-Hunt) and Michael Pitt-Rivers, were found guilty of homosexual offences and jailed.
  With his career in tatters and his private life painfully exposed, Wildeblood began his sentence a broken man, but he emerged from Wormwood Scrubs a year later determined to do all he could to change the way these draconian laws against homosexuality impacted on the lives of men like him.
  Daniel says: 「I'm incredibly proud to be part of a drama that tells such an important real-life story. Peter Wildeblood is a fascinating, complex, yet flawed character from a time when being a gay man in Britain was incredibly difficult - I can't wait to bring his tale to life for the BBC Two audience.」
  Patrick Holland, Channel Editor, BBC Two, said: 「50 years ago, it was a crime to be a gay man in the UK. Against The Law is a stunning piece that melds drama and documentary testimony to tell the story of one man, and his wider generation, as they struggled to make society accept their sexuality as non-criminal. It is brilliant to have a film that brings the authorship of Brian Fillis, the vision of director Fergus O'Brien, and the outstanding talent of Daniel Mays and cast to this important subject」
  The drama also features Mark Gatiss (Taboo, Sherlock) as Wildeblood's prison psychiatrist, Doctor Landers and Charlie Creed-Miles (Ripper Street, Peaky Blinders) as Superintendent Jones.
  Woven through this powerful drama is real-life testimony from a chorus of men who lived through those dark days, when homosexuals were routinely imprisoned or forced to undergo chemical aversion therapy in an attempt to cure them of their "condition". There is also testimony from a retired police officer whose job it was to enforce these laws, and a former psychiatric nurse who administered the so-called cures. All of these accounts serve to amplify the themes of the drama and help to immerse us in the reality of a dark chapter in our recent past, a past still within the reach of living memory.

评论:

  • 勤芳洲 4小时前 :

    现在的恐怖片都这德性嘛?这也太无聊了吧,一开始还想耐心看完,后面直接2倍速走起,只是无聊的想笑,故弄玄虚,浪费时间。抱歉,那个咒语我没有记住。

  • 拓跋清佳 8小时前 :

    伪纪录片,下咒题材都不新颖了,故事讲得也是稀碎,加上没有意义的穿插叙事,实在没意思,后半段全程两倍速看完的。故事有一种“今天是大黑佛母诞辰,请把这条消息转发到5个群,就能延年益寿”的感觉。

  • 初馨荣 3小时前 :

    还好后几个字不认识。

  • 明从安 2小时前 :

    不错的地方在于,电影带有浓重的地方色彩跟民族气息,让国人看了有较强的带入感,仿佛是发生在身边的事情一样,这可能也是电影真正吓人的地方。

  • 弦涵 1小时前 :

    进行本土化处理。

  • 帛湛芳 4小时前 :

    这些年一出来恐怖片就是伪纪录片,真他妈恶心!一点创新都没有!恐怖片已死!愚弄傻逼,傻逼还乐!

  • 呈楠 5小时前 :

    为了可以更好地感知到这部电影带来的恐惧感,特意使用投影仪在完全黑暗的环境下观看。就我个人而言,我的判断是预告片要比正片好看,同时叙事节奏存在问题,很多细节看得不算太明白,另外部分镜头似乎属于客观镜头,在设计上存在一些瑕疵。但是这部电影能够通过所谓冒犯观众让大家觉得晦气的方式登上热搜本身倒是足以证明电影的效果还是不错的,而且整个故事也算比较完整,头尾呼应,还有关键反转,再加上比较细致的妆容和道具设置,整体是值得获得一个较为不错的评价的。虽然开分上8是有点夸张,但是现在稳定在7左右的分数是还挺合理的。华语电影体系里,恐怖片一直鲜有佳作,如果每年都能出一两部这种水准的电影倒是还蛮好的,感觉这部电影是存在拍续集空间的,恐怖电影除了冒犯观众,还有什么新玩法可以探索呢?

  • 开朋义 4小时前 :

    打破第四面墙的伪纪录恐怖片。从开始的无聊到后半段的灵异,会让人蛮割裂的。

  • 仪香卉 8小时前 :

    柯孟融在类型片上做出了新突破,值得肯定,瑕不掩瑜。

  • 悟学林 6小时前 :

    不过这只是个恶作剧,

  • 全微婉 3小时前 :

    这片子的确挺适合上网飞的,因为它迎合的就是被所谓“影像互动”的体验感带坏的一代,试图用一点狡黠的小伎俩,为本来半瓶子醋的恐怖感注入一剂猛药。可红牛终究不能替代兴奋剂,大段与观众的联结只能用硬凹的亲情代劳,却并未与类型元素形成哪怕一秒钟的接轨。就这样,没有对民俗专属文化的挖掘,也没有对伪纪录片镜头合理性的思考,寄希望看到的精致版《中邪》,在柯孟融畏手畏脚的失控调度中,一点点沦为《昆池岩》的低配A货。同《哭悲》一样,它惹恼的远比震撼到的要多,可前者毕竟还有对中华文明公序良俗的挑衅,《咒》带来的价值,也只有在豆瓣评论区的“赛博跨火盆”活动里添个+1罢了。

  • 俊雅 0小时前 :

    真的算是千呼万唤的年度恐怖片,还算是有一些新意在,但是混乱的剪辑真的观感很差,大半时间都处于理不清故事线的状态,预告片名场面“大嫂冲刺”在正片里,确实让人全程菊紧,依然被吓到。小孩身上的莲蓬伤口,也引起观感不适,可以感受到导演豁出去的想恶心观众了;对于大家说的“晦气”,还好吧,我全程都没记住她那句咒语,因为最后俩字我不认识,她念了好几遍,我也没记住最后俩字,哈哈。

  • 操雅柔 7小时前 :

    在故事上要学会做减法,这个故事拍摄技术上呈现的复杂,反而影响了观众去直面故事,最后还要融入大片式对于主题的解构,反而散掉,但我很喜欢这部电影的配乐,和影片本身一样不易让人出戏,这在鬼片领域内已做得不错,具备较高的完成度。简介里写着对真实事件的改编,影片内容里丝毫看不出太多,这也是前期宣传太强调而导致我观感上产生疑问。

  • 卫柏华 0小时前 :

    吓死,让小孩子演这种恐怖片不太好吧!!那个阿东身材那么好,怎么不脱??

  • 卫泓霖 1小时前 :

    松了一口气,算是不负期待,想到了《环界》和《美国众神》,开辟出了一条网络梗造神的邪路。中午跟妹妹吃饭,朝她摆了片子里的手印,她当场捂脸想反射回来,告知她再抠深一些就佛母了。晚上26楼值班,被窝里嗡嗡响,打死一只苍蝇一只蜜蜂。不行,得把贞子那盘录相带和这块硬盘转出去……

  • 尔晶滢 7小时前 :

    缺点 中期有些剧情较为拖沓 所有演员无时无刻手拿摄像机有点出戏 还有所有恐怖片的通病主角团就硬作死 但瑕不掩瑜 85

  • 接芳芳 7小时前 :

    哎不是,真有人觉得因为那句话自己就被诅咒啊?

  • 司徒新立 8小时前 :

    看一半因为觉得既无聊又不恐怖而去翻豆瓣,评论说最后晦气,那就还是不看完了啦

  • 公星腾 9小时前 :

    顶着压力给个四星。其实当你相信了这一句咒语时,其实你就等于是导演给你讲的整个故事。就如同来到了影片的最后,女主说,接下来就是地道内的视频,估计有很多接受了前面一大段心理暗示的人,已经不太敢去看这个视频了。--女主在影片中,就是这种诡计性叙事的导演的替身。她也欺骗了大家。而跳跃式的时间线以及手持DV式的拍摄,都是为了这种诡计性叙事而存在的。这就能原谅了。

  • 元嘉惠 5小时前 :

    故弄玄虚,语焉不详,推进极慢,看到一半就不耐烦了。第一版预告片吓人指数10,正片只有1。竟然还有人真情实感的觉得晦气?我只觉得呵呵。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved